Sunday, November 4, 2012

Pharmaceutical and DTC Advertising


       For Jess Myrick’s guest lecture, we discussed the topic of health communication and ethics. According to Healthy People 2010, health communication can be defined as “the art and technique of informing, influencing and motivating audiences about important health issues. Health communication includes disease prevention, health promotion, health care policy, and the business of health care as well as the enhancement of the quality of life and heath of individuals.” As a side note, Healthy People 2010 is a program of nationwide health-promotion goals set by the United States Department of Health and Human Services. 

       During her lecture, Jess discussed the myriad of ethical issues that have arisen within the medical industry. One of which I wish to discuss further is pharmaceutical advertising/marketing.

       The United States is one of only two countries (the other is New Zealand) which allows direct pharmaceutical advertising to consumers. In Europe, for example, it is illegal to advertise pharmaceuticals in magazine and other media outlets. But in the United States, where the advertising culture is seemingly dominated by massive companies, it is commonplace to see advertisements for pharmaceutical drugs during every television commercial break or throughout a magazine. As Jess read in class, during 2004 the pharmaceutical industry spent $57.5 Billion on promotion with $4 billion of it going to direct-to-consumer advertising.

       Direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising of prescription drugs has increased rapidly in the United States during the last two decades, but it is a very controversial method. It is a form of advertising that is directed towards patients rather than healthcare professionals. Previously, prescription drug makers promoted their products only to health care professionals who were expected to interpret drug information for their patients. However, during the 1990s, drug manufacturers began targeting consumers which affected how professionals interacted with their patients. According to ABC news, opponents of DTC advertising say that ads are often not for life-threatening and treatable diseases, but rather for lifestyle problems. Opponents also cite “ethical issues when a doctor accepts promotional products from pharmaceutical companies.” In fact, a study conducted by the National Institute of health showed that DTC advertising is likely to increase the request rates of drugs and that real-life and long-term safety is at risk.

      Individuals on the others side of the debate say that pharmaceutical ads “inform consumers about important, yet treatable health conditions and encourage doctor/patient dialogue.” They see that lower-income consumers gain valuable information and consumers get an improved quality of care.

       Yet, I believe that pharmaceutical advertising needs a dramatic change in what it presents to the public. I also believe that DTC advertising should entirely be banned. These advertisements take advantage of the consumers and are intended to put pressure onto the professionals. Larry Woodard, CEO of Vigilante, a New York-based advertising agency, says that he would like to see “pharmaceutical companies take a bigger role in promoting health prevention with more community and faith-based efforts.” On the matter, he also mentioned that because drug companies receive taxpayer subsidies, their marketing efforts would “ring more true if we could believe they really have our best interests in mind.”

       The future of pharmaceutical advertising and the direct-to-consumer form is a complicated and uncertain one.  Companies are facing tighter adverting restrictions from the FDA, due in part to their questionable ethics, as well as the evolution of new media which brings competition. Instead of relying on print or television advertisements, consumers are now researching health information online, on such platforms as WebMD. In fact, in 2008, over 145 million U.S. adults looked up health information online as individuals saw these websites as “independent, objective medical resources.”

       On a last note, it is my hope that as technology evolves and pharmaceutical companies face competition from new sources of health information, pharmaceutical advertising will become ethical better. DTC advertising is not safe for consumers and should be more rigorously regulated by the FDA.


Other Sources Used:

No comments:

Post a Comment